Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Stats for This Blog
- 665,222 views
Is the Shroud real? Probably.
The Shroud of Turin may be the real burial cloth of Jesus. The carbon dating, once seemingly proving it was a medieval fake, is now widely thought of as suspect and meaningless. Even the famous Atheist Richard Dawkins admits it is controversial. Christopher Ramsey, the director of the Oxford Radiocarbon Laboratory, thinks more testing is needed. So do many other scientists and archeologists. This is because there are significant scientific and non-religious reasons to doubt the validity of the tests. Chemical analysis, all nicely peer-reviewed in scientific journals and subsequently confirmed by numerous chemists, shows that samples tested are chemically unlike the whole cloth. It was probably a mixture of older threads and newer threads woven into the cloth as part of a medieval repair. Recent robust statistical studies add weight to this theory. Philip Ball, the former physical science editor for Nature when the carbon dating results were published, recently wrote: “It’s fair to say that, despite the seemingly definitive tests in 1988, the status of the Shroud of Turin is murkier than ever.” If we wish to be scientific we must admit we do not know how old the cloth is. But if the newer thread is about half of what was tested – and some evidence suggests that – it is possible that the cloth is from the time of Christ.
No one has a good idea how front and back images of a crucified man came to be on the cloth. Yes, it is possible to create images that look similar. But no one has created images that match the chemistry, peculiar superficiality and profoundly mysterious three-dimensional information content of the images on the Shroud. Again, this is all published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
We simply do not have enough reliable information to arrive at a scientifically rigorous conclusion. Years ago, as a skeptic of the Shroud, I came to realize that while I might believe it was a fake, I could not know so from the facts. Now, as someone who believes it is the real burial shroud of Jesus of Nazareth, I similarly realize that a leap of faith over unanswered questions is essential.
My name is Dan Porter. Please email me at drporter@optonline.net
Most Popular
Recent Posts
- Sr. Genevieve’s drawing of the Holy Face
- New paintings based on the Shroud of Turin
- Another Book Review of Wilcox’s “The Truth about the Shroud of Turin”
- Quote for today on why the shroud image is not a scorch
- Upcoming, exciting exhibition on the Shroud of Turin in Málaga, Spain
- The image on the Shroud of Turin is not a scorch
- Does Colin need to start over?
- More on don’t confuse him with facts, his mind is made up
- Michael O’Brien’s portraits of Christ often a likeness to the Shroud of Turin
- Internet Radio that plays The Shroud
- Why do we think the Resurrection was a process? What if it was not?
- More on coins and swollen cheeks
- Don’t confuse him with facts, his mind is made up
- Quote for today by Arthur Schopenhauer
- Another Justinian, this one circa 652
Categories
Pages
Blogroll
- A Blogspotting Anglican Episcopalian
- Facts Plus Facts
- God, Christ: Questions & Faith
- Ohio State University Shroud of Turin Conference
- Picture of Jesus?
- Shroud of Turin and the Resurrection of Jesus
- Shroud of Turin for Journalists
- Shroud of Turin Story
- Shroud of Turin Story Blog
- Shroud of Turin Topics
- Shroud University
- Skeptical Spectacle
- The Definitive Shroud of Turin FAQ
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008